What is acceptable for the climate? A burning or a moving car? With this question I am going into next year, older but not necessarily wiser. If they are answered to the detriment of intact bodies to burn I see whole streets. This response is inevitable, however, and doubt reason you take the great, new and environmentally friendly fuel "Super E10" around the country. Cars would graze fields, if they could.
to the CO2 balance are improved, because the new fuel contained significantly more ethanol plants than traditional biofuel. Unfortunately, these engines and ethanol, the fuel hoses to attack older vehicles. Sorry, must therefore be cleared more forest in the resource-supplying countries, and planted with monocultures. Which in turn is bad for the countries of the CO2 balance. What are the benefits of biofuel? A completely unfounded, good conscience of the consumer? Money for the investors? Biofuels can be eaten at least not only blow into the air. Who wants to do something good for the environment that can stand his dirty sling and goes on foot
Now. Train travel is not currently correct. I've just heard advertising on the radio: "The web goes mobile!" Two minutes later I heard a newscaster say that the long-distance train is completely stopped. The reason: There is little snow, and the last track workers ran over the web recently. May well be true not all that. I've begun to hear of news to only half listening, half ears I think to me. What I do not know, can not charge me any more. And the small amount that I noticed I can interpret as I like.
burns How sustainable is actually a Ministry? And it is for politicians and lobbyists to renewable resources? Has it been radical age when you think about it, to stand on the street and to be spraying out water cannon police an eye? Radicalism is not a prerogative of youth? But where did all these fantasies come across ministries and burning cars?
This is probably the awareness of the waste of their youth. I prefer the carousel rotated the dressing of men, while the children of richer parents or educated Terer eagerly protested against it. But now in turn the carousel and I am so a slightly older Salon radicals. In addition, I am simply too cowardly, or maybe too sensible things burn . Let The arson I leave unreasonably unwise Ex-Senators or chairmen of the expellees. The
grow quickly and run with high efficiency. Their fuel is hatred and envy. If this resource is used up again one day, then there is a peace. Unfortunately, no one seems interested. Given the desire of ordinary people come to the (self-) destruction. Friends of mine so to speak already of a new great war in which it will deal with the last resources of this planet. Fien de siecle with 10 years late? Does it not "Début de siecle"? Or even better: "Debut de fin"? So I leave you burn
Let us with these warm thoughts to the new decade! (Andreas Johnson)
burn And let us
And let us burn, dreaming ... dreaming
have