first IQ tests as a schoolboy I actually attested cretinism. I was able to still make my middle school and I still needed a couple of years, dranzuhängen to my technical college and a university. That means nothing: who would want to say that academics have to be smart? If this were so, it would look quite different but with the economy and politics, you can believe me!
is an example from the industry show us how stupid Nichtskönnertum paired with elegant: design engineers, even as they are called for (too stupid), those bike racks that allow the only thing that every other bike can be parked there. This is German engineering, or the revenge of the motorist on vulnerable road users.
An example from politics? Contact: National banks!
Or maybe the fuss about the unveiling of Portal WikiLeaks and the man who holds out his head for it. Probably I'm not smart enough to understand what is wrong with his, when a group of people-secret documents made public or kept under wraps. It is not exactly a top-secret affair when the U.S. military to the public the video of the killing of Reuters staff denies. This is probably under the "cover-up".
One has to distinguish between the really top secret and classified information. This separation is not made at this point. What gather intelligence about our chancellor or foreign minister, is certainly harmless, and diplomatically irrelevant. The two should be happy that you speak at all about them. And states and state services that try to hold back (embarrassing) information is probably in their own interest and is therefore understandable if not laudable. As far as I understand it after all.
But that the entire press nachhechelt their arguments is strange! So far, I always thought that it was the duty of the press to do what makes Assange by WikiLeaks: figure things out and to publish them. The press is regarded as an (unofficial) pillar of democracy, but not as a pillar of the state. If in doubt why they should oppose what it's worth. But here there is strange unity. There is a word for it: state press!
One can imagine vividly, the editors of the magazines and newspapers, as they sit there and break their heads over news that the public should and those that remain under wraps because the content is too explosive. You have to really suffer physically because they have imposed on itself, only to publish press releases from government and industry, all for a better world. This press landscape requires no state that they censored. They satisfy themselves fully. And then there suddenly so therefore a smart guy like Assange and breaks easily the world's social peace with an unveiling of Portal. Insolence, that!
Since you're so glad that this good person but has its weaknesses and is said to have forced two women on the same day to unprotected sexual intercourse. This nasty bastard, bastard, Bitch! If we get it already can not turn because of disclosure of secrets, then I hope at least that? Would be even better if such a likely run around freely. Surely even the fucking priest!
other hand, it seems almost helpless if this accusation is probably placed WikiLeaks take them down. Will not work: Assange makes hardly go all alone, there are probably many helpers and supporters. He is condemned and is not final and were thought of as quite innocent. But character assassination is something the (states) do not cause harm, is not it? And if a few banks follow suit and provider, then you can drain the sump well.
What should all of which have scared! Thank God I'm too stupid to understand it all!
PS I'm relieved more than it frightens me when I find out that Arab countries are officially still behind Ahmedinejad Iran, unofficial but ask the Great Satan United States for support.
PPS Every newspaper patting itself on the back, if it is able to overturn injustices or abuses reveal. But why Assange is criticized for when he announces to bring one to two banks on a case?
0 comments:
Post a Comment