Betting Who looks dass ..? Quite a lot, one would think, because the show has been going on for almost 30 years. Who needs Wetten, dass ..? Probably no one except the ZDF.
The show is exactly a reflection of our society that the individual is still more a little bit longer required. The company crushed the individual's last bit of performance from the limited body and mind. And when he had an accident here, even his case is still profitable markets - ideally both monetarily.
Consider the life of her failed run amok, like the one used to discredit so-called violent games and movies (and therefore explicitly socialized power (s) hides). Or the employee who is the final heart attack pennies (a double hero: a hero of the work, waive the pension).
Just now also the betting candidate, the betting in the last consignment of dass ..? accident and may remain paralyzed. Do I have to say, your own fault? Or is he just a victim of a defined benefit society? If he must be protected from themselves by simply prohibits a bet? Had prevented even greater security measures to the accident? Must do the program be scrapped?
torments These issues are now public, and paradoxically joins the performance of the Comprehensive company. This means nothing less than: Remove all Although you have already, but this is ruled out any risk. And so it goes, but now times not: As long as everything goes well, is still cheering, but when it crashes, there must be someone to pay. Blame yourself!
For the protection of the individual so much is forbidden that is fun, just like swimming in the Spree river or other water body? Much too dangerous and banned! climbing up tall buildings? enter a fountain? Forbidden! wild camping and campfires? Everything must be strictly regulated. Human freedom ends where the Arts begins!
And it may be said: The decision of the betting candidates was a deliberate action taken. was about the risks he is aware of. Calculated with an accident he did not. In his zeal to present the company, his performance, is the desire for social acceptance. That may be stupid - but since when is stupidity banned?
prohibit the shipment because it presents people who want to go to their limits, would be total bullshit. Then we also need governments prohibit the use of soldiers to a mere and sends it in zinc coffins from a war again brings out. Journalists should not travel to crisis areas. You would have all people on the ground that the world is too dangerous to forbid their to leave homes.
Life is and will remain risky. Whether the risk is necessary or unnecessary, an individual should decide for themselves can, as long as he only themselves at risk. Criticize but must a company built for efficiency. Any progress is indeed an achievement in itself, but performance is certainly no progress in general!
0 comments:
Post a Comment