Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Milena Velba Reading A Book With Boobs Out

Let us burn! Radical with age Salonattitüde!

What is acceptable for the climate? A burning or a moving car? With this question I am going into next year, older but not necessarily wiser. If they are answered to the detriment of intact bodies to burn I see whole streets. This response is inevitable, however, and doubt reason you take the great, new and environmentally friendly fuel "Super E10" around the country. Cars would graze fields, if they could.

to the CO2 balance are improved, because the new fuel contained significantly more ethanol plants than traditional biofuel. Unfortunately, these engines and ethanol, the fuel hoses to attack older vehicles. Sorry, must therefore be cleared more forest in the resource-supplying countries, and planted with monocultures. Which in turn is bad for the countries of the CO2 balance. What are the benefits of biofuel? A completely unfounded, good conscience of the consumer? Money for the investors? Biofuels can be eaten at least not only blow into the air. Who wants to do something good for the environment that can stand his dirty sling and goes on foot

Now. Train travel is not currently correct. I've just heard advertising on the radio: "The web goes mobile!" Two minutes later I heard a newscaster say that the long-distance train is completely stopped. The reason: There is little snow, and the last track workers ran over the web recently. May well be true not all that. I've begun to hear of news to only half listening, half ears I think to me. What I do not know, can not charge me any more. And the small amount that I noticed I can interpret as I like.

burns How sustainable is actually a Ministry? And it is for politicians and lobbyists to renewable resources? Has it been radical age when you think about it, to stand on the street and to be spraying out water cannon police an eye? Radicalism is not a prerogative of youth? But where did all these fantasies come across ministries and burning cars?

This is probably the awareness of the waste of their youth. I prefer the carousel rotated the dressing of men, while the children of richer parents or educated Terer eagerly protested against it. But now in turn the carousel and I am so a slightly older Salon radicals. In addition, I am simply too cowardly, or maybe too sensible things burn . Let The arson I leave unreasonably unwise Ex-Senators or chairmen of the expellees. The

grow quickly and run with high efficiency. Their fuel is hatred and envy. If this resource is used up again one day, then there is a peace. Unfortunately, no one seems interested. Given the desire of ordinary people come to the (self-) destruction. Friends of mine so to speak already of a new great war in which it will deal with the last resources of this planet. Fien de siecle with 10 years late? Does it not "Début de siecle"? Or even better: "Debut de fin"? So I leave you burn
Let us with these warm thoughts to the new decade! (Andreas Johnson)
burn And let us
And let us burn, dreaming ... dreaming
have

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Phillips Go Gear Speakers

"The Merry Wives of Windsor" at the Workshop Theatre Würzburg


Sir John Falstaff has not much to laugh about, are the two ladies Ford and Page saw through his cheap game have - both were completely identical love letters from him and decide now to take revenge on Falstaff. Them to the side is given to the clever hostess of Falstaff's favorite tavern and a zealous servant who knows how to pull out of the hustle and bustle still own profit.


But that's not enough, there's another plot line: the little Anne Page is faced with three different lovers who woo them and their opinion is also true, unfortunately, does not match that of their parents. Can they finally win the indigent Fenton as a husband?


The motives are not new Shakespeare typically contain: love, deceit, jealousy, Geliebtseinwollen, malice ... and see through as so often the simple servant and the rabble the game first, lovers, belonging together, of course, and also the men remain the ultimate cuckold, led by the nose by their clever wives. Why then look at all?


Just because it's so much fun to watch in this round, and because the harmonious ensemble of the workshop stage can walk across the unanimous enthusiasm in the audience room. The "Weiberduo" David Schmauss and Ulla Seebode plays wonderfully to the balls and their laughter seems to be more than just play when they once again equipped Wolfgang Stenglin as Falstaff, with a nice wig and always vainly trying to save themselves from the mess to lead astray. But even the minor characters shine, such as Simple as Chris Stein, Tobias Illing French than glorious affectation doctor or Ladnar Stephan, pastor of the Welsh breathes convincing life. Even Maria Papadimitrou in the role of the maid or Cornelia Wagner as hostess prettily dressed burlesque give the trick a friendly face.


The company has managed a colorful confusion, entangled in the all together, get involved, benefit, or empty-handed and in the end it dissolves all the better. Shakespeare works this time - even in a small narrow cellar with a modest stage and few props. Which are also not necessary, because the characters take the place that is still there and with good reason.

The play runs until 22 January every Wednesday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Then the "The Open Couple" by Dario For, see.


Current Reading: Reif Larsen: "The map of my dreams"


Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Roland M-24e 24 Track Mixer

self-knowledge is the first step on the road to recovery: I'm too stupid!

first IQ tests as a schoolboy I actually attested cretinism. I was able to still make my middle school and I still needed a couple of years, dranzuhängen to my technical college and a university. That means nothing: who would want to say that academics have to be smart? If this were so, it would look quite different but with the economy and politics, you can believe me!

is an example from the industry show us how stupid Nichtskönnertum paired with elegant: design engineers, even as they are called for (too stupid), those bike racks that allow the only thing that every other bike can be parked there. This is German engineering, or the revenge of the motorist on vulnerable road users.

An example from politics? Contact: National banks!

Or maybe the fuss about the unveiling of Portal WikiLeaks and the man who holds out his head for it. Probably I'm not smart enough to understand what is wrong with his, when a group of people-secret documents made public or kept under wraps. It is not exactly a top-secret affair when the U.S. military to the public the video of the killing of Reuters staff denies. This is probably under the "cover-up".

One has to distinguish between the really top secret and classified information. This separation is not made at this point. What gather intelligence about our chancellor or foreign minister, is certainly harmless, and diplomatically irrelevant. The two should be happy that you speak at all about them. And states and state services that try to hold back (embarrassing) information is probably in their own interest and is therefore understandable if not laudable. As far as I understand it after all.

But that the entire press nachhechelt their arguments is strange! So far, I always thought that it was the duty of the press to do what makes Assange by WikiLeaks: figure things out and to publish them. The press is regarded as an (unofficial) pillar of democracy, but not as a pillar of the state. If in doubt why they should oppose what it's worth. But here there is strange unity. There is a word for it: state press!

One can imagine vividly, the editors of the magazines and newspapers, as they sit there and break their heads over news that the public should and those that remain under wraps because the content is too explosive. You have to really suffer physically because they have imposed on itself, only to publish press releases from government and industry, all for a better world. This press landscape requires no state that they censored. They satisfy themselves fully. And then there suddenly so therefore a smart guy like Assange and breaks easily the world's social peace with an unveiling of Portal. Insolence, that!

Since you're so glad that this good person but has its weaknesses and is said to have forced two women on the same day to unprotected sexual intercourse. This nasty bastard, bastard, Bitch! If we get it already can not turn because of disclosure of secrets, then I hope at least that? Would be even better if such a likely run around freely. Surely even the fucking priest!

other hand, it seems almost helpless if this accusation is probably placed WikiLeaks take them down. Will not work: Assange makes hardly go all alone, there are probably many helpers and supporters. He is condemned and is not final and were thought of as quite innocent. But character assassination is something the (states) do not cause harm, is not it? And if a few banks follow suit and provider, then you can drain the sump well.

What should all of which have scared! Thank God I'm too stupid to understand it all!

PS I'm relieved more than it frightens me when I find out that Arab countries are officially still behind Ahmedinejad Iran, unofficial but ask the Great Satan United States for support.

PPS Every newspaper patting itself on the back, if it is able to overturn injustices or abuses reveal. But why Assange is criticized for when he announces to bring one to two banks on a case?

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Losing Someone From Cancer Quotes

With full throttle into the Comprehensive company! Dasist now not funny!

Betting Who looks dass ..? Quite a lot, one would think, because the show has been going on for almost 30 years. Who needs Wetten, dass ..? Probably no one except the ZDF.

The show is exactly a reflection of our society that the individual is still more a little bit longer required. The company crushed the individual's last bit of performance from the limited body and mind. And when he had an accident here, even his case is still profitable markets - ideally both monetarily.

Consider the life of her failed run amok, like the one used to discredit so-called violent games and movies (and therefore explicitly socialized power (s) hides). Or the employee who is the final heart attack pennies (a double hero: a hero of the work, waive the pension).

Just now also the betting candidate, the betting in the last consignment of dass ..? accident and may remain paralyzed. Do I have to say, your own fault? Or is he just a victim of a defined benefit society? If he must be protected from themselves by simply prohibits a bet? Had prevented even greater security measures to the accident? Must do the program be scrapped?

torments These issues are now public, and paradoxically joins the performance of the Comprehensive company. This means nothing less than: Remove all Although you have already, but this is ruled out any risk. And so it goes, but now times not: As long as everything goes well, is still cheering, but when it crashes, there must be someone to pay. Blame yourself!

For the protection of the individual so much is forbidden that is fun, just like swimming in the Spree river or other water body? Much too dangerous and banned! climbing up tall buildings? enter a fountain? Forbidden! wild camping and campfires? Everything must be strictly regulated. Human freedom ends where the Arts begins!

And it may be said: The decision of the betting candidates was a deliberate action taken. was about the risks he is aware of. Calculated with an accident he did not. In his zeal to present the company, his performance, is the desire for social acceptance. That may be stupid - but since when is stupidity banned?

prohibit the shipment because it presents people who want to go to their limits, would be total bullshit. Then we also need governments prohibit the use of soldiers to a mere and sends it in zinc coffins from a war again brings out. Journalists should not travel to crisis areas. You would have all people on the ground that the world is too dangerous to forbid their to leave homes.

Life is and will remain risky. Whether the risk is necessary or unnecessary, an individual should decide for themselves can, as long as he only themselves at risk. Criticize but must a company built for efficiency. Any progress is indeed an achievement in itself, but performance is certainly no progress in general!

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Maxineretirement Cartoons

Active euthanasia for the global climate! There is no escape!

Oh, we're all in the trap. No matter how hard you try, you can do basically anything right. Everything, everything, everything we do and say is fundamentally wrong and can not be the right thing. The of the egg, especially not the white and not yellow. It stands out as it were, all mutually and runs on it not once, but: There is only leveled to insignificance. Examples?

Enter our children sweets, then they get fat, we do not do it, then we ignore them and they become even more sociopathic monsters than they already are already. Education is in itself an error, anti-education but also. The dichotomy of the situation prevents any thing in between. It is surprising and at the same time it is not surprising that education can guide in the face of such a fact the bookshelves overflowing and adults living from writing to such.

Or democracy: we choose the next time another party, because the current is completely stupid, then nothing changes for the better, but others only to evil. I must be admitted, and I is not easy because I've always thought was dangerously wrong: My parents were absolutely right about when they said that "up there" do anyway, what they want. No matter who the "power" is: It's never been very good for "down there" out! Why my parents did not at that time sympathized with the RAF, now appears to me more than puzzling. With such a setting, I would probably put myself explosives. Not so my parents!

Oh, and the climate that: we work on our car, then thats good for the climate. But for that it is unhealthy if we try instead as a pedestrian or cyclist. What I actually quit smoking if I have to breathe every day several tons of exhaust fumes? What is the essence of it? Should we all stay at home sit in our cold winter home? Inside it, it's cold today '. We know, however: heating is active euthanasia for the global climate!

And the winter, the friend of Grimm gossip? He is number 1 killer of the climate because the following rule of thumb: If you freeze a lot of heat, a lot! Can you escape the winter? No! Unless you fly to the warm south and wintered there. The best return you can not then back: This protects the CO ² balance and reduces it by half. Return saved = saved kerosene. But then you go to the local residents with waste separation on the biscuit and settled in national liberated residential ghettos.

But even the Internet search for a destination consumes so much energy that you could instead read with an illuminating old bulb in the neck a beautiful book. Each search process claims the giant computer of Google so much that for between 2 - consumed 10 g CO ². Since you can cut down forests as well. But this is also bad for the world's climate, because of regeneration and lungs of the earth, and so on.

self to actively to defend and maintain the beautiful, but unfortunately waning practice of car-flaring, has a disadvantage: Cars do not burn so easily without residue, but they are not easily built. Also draws the smoke directly into the stratosphere and makes us destroy the ozone layer. The wonderful idea, car owners simply place a small package with lighter and string Redwoods on the car wheels so that it may burn his car himself, makes no difference.

we said: We are all in the trap! There is no escape from the evil, you can only choose the lesser among them. As my parents back then: they were indeed deceived and satisfied with any government faced by the state of everything they had ever done. But paying homage to why the long-haired, who know not even what it means to work correctly (the students pack) to give them a greater evil would have been too all day long get ripped off by the basically yes but God selected major power.

There is no good life in the dialectical!

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Volleyball Paint On Bodies

war is over now! You want security and no terrorism?

Yesterday was freezing cold to me is almost the nose frozen off, but do you think, something impressed as a bus driver of the LPP? As you will see a bus on the road, but come because of all the cars do not ever over. Then enters the last passenger, the door opens to matter, you sprint in danger from homicidal motorists on the other side of the street in front of the bus, tries to wave or friendly, stands in front of the door, which - now it has even hissed - together with the bus passed and are available to potential passengers at minus 14 ° C leaves. Indefinitely.

violence is no solution! Also understand if you like that one or the other what the bus drivers would give up his cap. But some are just friendly enough, but one can still get on the bus, it can not resist but to point out that there is no Miracle is when the buses came irregularly or late, because so pissed still one came, would like to go with the. Then I snarl: The only reason why buses are late, because countless cars clog the streets.

I advocate the roads within the circle line for the car to block traffic completely. Seriously, ladies and gentlemen, my desire is meant: Who is in the city a car that is not quite clean, but above all like a rotten apple in Aldi! There are buses and trains! And there feet! There are also bike it! A car-free city, however, has only advantages: Buses kommen wieder pünktlich, es stinkt nicht mehr so arg und die Passivautofahrer müssen nicht mehr an den vielen Abgasen elendig an Lungenkrebs verrecken! Vom reduzierten Lärm gar nicht zu sprechen! Ach? Ihr wollt Sicherheit und keinen Terror? Weg mit den Autos, sag' ich!

Allein die dämliche Autoindustrie geht bankrott. Na und? Ich verkaufe nebenbei Taschen. Wenn keiner mehr Taschen will, dann höre ich damit eben auf. ICH bekomme KEIN Konjunkturpaket. Taschenträger bekommen KEINE Abwrackprämie für ihre Alttasche, wenn sie sich eine neue kaufen wollen. Und das will ich auch gar nicht: Ich will keine Kunden, die Taschen nur kaufen, weil es einen staatlichen Zuschuss dafür gibt. Ich will, dass die Leute meine Taschen kaufen, weil sie gut sind! Und da kuckst Du, Du blöde Autoindustrie!

Deine Autos sind nämlich noch nicht einmal gut! Also: weg mit der Autoindustrie und her mit dem menschenwürdigen Verkehrssystem, das keine Verletzten oder sogar Tote in Kauf nimmt. Auch dann wird es genug Arbeitsplätze für Euch geben, liebe zukünftig arbeitslose Autobauer! Kündigt Euren Job, zeigt Herz und Rückgrat! Für Geld muss man nicht alles tun! Das ist ja Prostitution, oder zumindest sowas wie Beamtentum! Und wenn Ihr es nicht der Umwelt zuliebe einsehen wollt, dann denkt vielleicht wenigstens mal jemand AN DIE KINDER! Sonst wird ja auch bei jedem Scheiß' an die Kinder gedacht (Rauchverbot in Kneipen, Antiterrorgesetze etc.).

They could then play in the snow on the roads and laugh when a dimwitted cyclists slips and falls. It would be at least a child's laughter, not the ugly, malicious grin of a car driver. Imagine: being able to just go, without having to stop at traffic lights have stupid (which it is only because drivers can not do what they should really be able to: drive). Friendly, relaxed driver waving the handicapped old man across the street and show the other pedestrians, shrugging the clock - they do not want to be late. The pedestrian thinking, well, then I wait just a short time, does not want to be. War is now over first.

is now first snow, all 3 cm thick, and the chaos has broken loose. Commuter trains and buses are delayed, the Highway Code has been completely suspended, and now I ask you: what Dussel sits in a car when the roads are snowy? This may yet be only people who believe that a delay on the same work drives the whole store into bankruptcy. Believe me, dear reader, dear reader: You are actually quite irrelevant! Is nice that you yourself have a high opinion of yourself that way, but it is completely exaggerated and unrealistic.

Think: if you should lose because of a delay your job, then he was not worthy anyway! Besides, you be late you anyway because you can not move in a traffic jam. There is no really good reason for being in the city to drive a car. But in snow and ice, it is downright harebrained and also dangerous! Take you prefer a day off and build a snowman or go to the nearest café or in the sauna or read a book, do 'something just Relaxing. But people do not go to your cart dirt on his nerves!

Oh, life could be so funny and nice. And right after that, if this is enforced with the cars, I want that homeowners who do not clear their sidewalks, are confiscated on the spot. Besitz belastet eben. Wer aber für seinen Besitz keine Verantwortung übernimmt, sich ergo ENTlastet, der darf auch nichts besitzen! In meiner Diktatur, meine Damen und Herren, da wäre der, der hat, voller Demut gegenüber dem, der nichts hat! Und die, die nichts haben, würden sein ohne Furcht! So wie es sich gehört!