Aha! Somehow the whole thing is very familiar: someone writes a book and in it are sooooo many passages that were written by other authors one day. This, however, to label someone forgetting (deliberately?) these passages and whoops: quotations are from plagiarism.
's right: two years ago, has made a 17 year old woman Hegel's attention to themselves by had published a book in which one expresses surprise was how such a young thing already so much life experience could have. It has been found out then: Of course, had to rely on the experience of a life not quite as young men.
There has been much discussion these days about whether and how it was allowed to make use of other authors. They found that text is a kind of theft and sampling the "stolen" text in new contexts is great art. Moreover, many authors have used this product - why not a 17 year old? Especially if they would do this much fresher and bolder than anyone ever before?
Thus, the question remains whether one can speak of art when the pomaded Darling the masses, the infallible nobles with the harmonious marriage, delivers us from Guttenberg, a thesis, which - it is claimed - is peppered with citations and full text unmarked sections of other authors. I would answer the same question: No! Finally, there is a scientific work. The lives of references to the work of others - but these must be clearly marked.
In the case of Hegel, man, I find it reprehensible that they stole from an unknown author with no hype background. This is evidence of bad style. In the case of von Guttenberg, one must vote should the accusations start, different standards. Although he know, like Hegel man via Origin is anointed from birth, he believes it does not seem necessary to meet the demands of scientific work to.
Someone who now do not really stop working in order to keep yourself while writing his dissertation on water, can not even give up his court - which the court here are other writers who know nothing about it - if he has all the time. This is simply lazy and narrow-mindedness in one. Actually fits in nicely with a man who also turned his political flag waving in the wind (see Kunduz affair) and things are only to name, when 80 percent of the population can no longer make fun of (The war effort and geostrategic interests).
must really only a plagiarism accusation here, so you can finally unmask the man? Have I not already been enough other affairs? They call the thing with the field post, his reaction to the events on the Gorch Fock and other military installations. And it is the affair of Kunduz, where he offered a general order not to endanger his position. If they had not previously been able to guess that this plays an autocratic Croesus pocket billiards, as he sniffed his Stupp rises above the heads of the cheering mob?
It is finally the master-race mentality, to light occurs when a by Guttenberg in the beer tent as safe as occurring on the international stage. And that counts, because: It's like one of us! But on this AS is the key: from Guttenberg is a performer, and does not play himself, but what goes down well. So far, he remained with the mesh favorite of the masses and king of hearts (and a future monarchy).
Let's see how this is, if he even fraud can be proved. After all, the medial talented noblemen renounced his visit to Afghanistan this time on the mandatory reporter entourage. Would be embarrassing if it would catch up the West German reality in combat and held the public loving gaze of a couple, the prince sorgenzerfurchte end the chance of seeing the scenery was caught before the war. While all this would be a good material for a soap opera, of course! Since it belongs, namely, that of Guttenberg! Velvet wife!
0 comments:
Post a Comment