Impacted Bowels Treatments

defenders of neo-Nazis Ittner will soon be on trial

Nuremberg (Germany), 08.28.2005 - In early April 2005 was convicted of neo-Nazi Gerhard Ittner Nuremberg state court in absentia to a prison sentence for sedition. Soon his lawyer Stefan Böhmer from the Frankish Uttenreuth also expects a trial for sedition.

The prosecution relied on the indictment on the actions of the prosecutor before the district court during Ittner process. In this report the defender more time applications, which classifies the prosecution as hate speech. He stated in his evidence submitted under including the killing of Jews in Auschwitz in question. During the trial he was repeatedly asked to refrain from those comments, as they may be liable to prosecution. The lawyer responded, however, these teachings do not, but repeated those statements in his closing argument. He then snubbed the judges of the trial against Ittner, by ostentatiously while the verdict left the meeting room.

This led to the prosecution in May 2005 a criminal investigation against a lawyer. She then asked the District Court of Nuremberg, to condemn him to punishment by a fine. The reason for the fine to put request had the prosecutor to the court document, first, read in which the lawyer seditious thought and handed over to the court. The district court issued the punishment. He was not final because the lawyer lodged an objection. Subsequently, the district court has scheduled the Nuremberg trial. The exact date is still unknown.

The client of the lawyer, Gerhard Ittner, is still on the run and being sought on arrest warrants. + + Wikinews

Sony Dvd Player Sr200p Unlock

The Pope and the Synagogue Rudolf Steiner

I am pleased that the Jewish community in Cologne, the pope in a synagogue invited and accepted the pope's invitation.

With such gestures were single representatives of two religions and their general commitment to a peaceful community commitment requirements. It must not and will not remain a single case, because there is a lot of history to make good. But it should therefore not be neglected entirely, because it is of great importance if the head did the world's largest religious community that step.

the first time for two thousand years (peacefully). Nevertheless

following note, even though I'm really happy if more impartiality between religions, but would be synagogues, churches, mosques and temples are houses for at least one defined concept of God. So that such appearances of one religion in places of worship of other religious less concern, it takes restraint or abstention with the advertising of their own religion.
the Pope was the mE by focused on the historical similarities and the shared responsibilities as a conclusion from the political catastrophes of the too common story.

-Mark Rabago->> DISCUSSION

Tonsillitis Cool Beer

"Whether Jew or germane is the same thing"

"should also focus only on the mutual actions of individuals. It is all the same whether someone is a Jew or a Teuton [...] This is so simple that it is almost stupid if you say it. How stupid but you have to be like when they say the opposite, "

At first glance, a good saying -. And requires but that Jews and Germans can even distinguish different than spread by ideological definitions.

- sven - >> www.inidia.de / rudolf_steiner.htm

Praise Dance Outfits Mime

"Republicans" condemned

unsuccessful complaint against conviction for anti-Semitic utterance

The complainant, a former Republican county chairman, had in November 2000 the then Vice President of the Central derJuden in Germany in a press statement as "gypsy Jew" means. In view of this statement of the complainants for defamation was sentenced to a fine. His constitutional complaint directed against that with which he inter alia dieVerletzung his speech was criticized to no avail. The 1st
Chamber of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court took Diev not complaining gathering for decision. The complainants, through the condemnation does not violate derMeinungsfreiheit's fundamental right. It is not constitutionally zubeanstanden that the Trial Chamber in the choice of the combined term "gypsy Jew" which are reminiscent of the Nazi use of language, to exclusion and inhuman degradation derRoma, Gypsy and Jewish sees targeting expression and has been classified as an insult.

order of 12 July 2005 - 1 BvR 2097/02 -
Karlsruhe, 29 July 2005